Despite perennial efforts to pit jobs against environmental regulations recent analyses would suggest the U.S. EPA's regulations are actually creating jobs rather than eliminating them.
The University of Massachusetts evaluated the job market impact projection from two rules
which will force the power sector to make substantial capital purchases for infrastructure upgrades and pollution control equipment. Their findings indicate these two rules will
require about
1.46 million years of new labor to make those changes happen over the
next five years -- the equivalent of 290,000 full-time jobs.
I would never dispute the real and sizable costs of compliance which would run in the ballpark of $200 billion. However, at this point, it isn't just the greenies saying these jobs would make a much-needed
dent in unemployment. The clean energy and energy efficiency sectors are
among the fastest growing segments of the nation’s economy. These job markets are
putting people back to work and attracting new opportunities and
investments to countless communities across the nation.
On top the jobs benefit, environmental regulation serves as a catalyst for industries to upgrade, innovate and evolve. To do so the nation builds a diversified and skilled workforce. The EPA also tasks industry with solving problems that markets ignore like environmental and public health.
According to the Office of
Management and Budget, the EPA generates up to $551 billion in economic
benefits every year. A 2010 analysis of rules passed in the prior decade, calculates the
benefits-to-cost ratios across various government agencies. The EPA came
out on top with the highest ratios by far, with benefits from its
regulations exceeding costs by an average of more than 10 to 1.
The net benefit of compliance
boosts GDP in the long run by creating livable wage jobs and making
communities both healthier
and more productive.
No comments:
Post a Comment